Kullick v. Skyline Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 Ronald and Susan Kullick appeal from the opinion and order of the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, granting summary judgment to Skyline Homeowners Association. We affirm.
¶2 The following issues are raised on appeal:
¶3 (1) Whether the District Court correctly determined that the Kullicks do not have an implied easement by existing use over Skyline Drive;
¶4 (2) Whether the District Court correctly determined that the Kullicks do not have an implied easement by necessity over Skyline Drive; and
¶5 (3) Whether Skyline Homeowners Association is entitled to costs and attorney…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Graham v. MacKMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- Finstad v. W.R. Grace & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
- Albert G. Hoyem Trust v. GaltMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Greenup v. RussellMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Schmid v. McDowellMontana Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Watson v. DundasMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Burlison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Palmer v. BahmMontana Supreme Court · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.