Legal Opinion

Kullick v. Skyline Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2003No. 02-679PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Ronald and Susan Kullick appeal from the opinion and order of the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, granting summary judgment to Skyline Homeowners Association. We affirm.

¶2 The following issues are raised on appeal:

¶3 (1) Whether the District Court correctly determined that the Kullicks do not have an implied easement by existing use over Skyline Drive;

¶4 (2) Whether the District Court correctly determined that the Kullicks do not have an implied easement by necessity over Skyline Drive; and

¶5 (3) Whether Skyline Homeowners Association is entitled to costs and attorney…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graham v. MacKMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Finstad v. W.R. Grace & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Albert G. Hoyem Trust v. GaltMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Greenup v. RussellMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Schmid v. McDowellMontana Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Baltrusch v. BaltruschMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Watson v. DundasMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Burlison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Palmer v. BahmMontana Supreme Court · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API