Greenup v. Russell
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage
¶1 The Twenty-first Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, granted the motion of Robert and Peggy Russell to dismiss this action pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata and denied Calvin Greenup’s motion to set aside a default judgment entered against him in a previous action. Greenup appeals. We affirm.
¶2 We restate the issues as:
¶3 1. Did the District Court err in refusing to set aside Greenup’s default?
¶4 2. Did the court err in dismissing Greenup’s complaint pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata?
¶5 3. Are the Russells entitled to their attorney fees on appeal under Rule 32,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First Bank (NA)-Billings v. HeidemaMontana Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re the Marriage of MossMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Hollister v. ForsytheMontana Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by30 opinions
- Kullick v. Skyline Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
- In re P.D.L.Montana Supreme Court · 2004
- Wittich Law Firm, P.C. v. O'ConnellMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Sun Mountain Sports, Inc. v. GoreMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Neil Consultants, Inc. v. LindemanMontana Supreme Court · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.