Legal Opinion

Finstad v. W.R. Grace & Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2000No. 99-444PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Kenneth R. Finstad and Edith L. Finstad, husband and wife (Finstads), filed suit against W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. (W.R. Grace) in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County. A jury trial resulted in a verdict in favor of the Finstads, awarding $400,000 in compensatory damages and determining that an award of punitive damages was warranted. Immediately thereafter, the District Court conducted a mini-trial regarding the award of punitive damages. At the conclusion of the punitive damage mini-trial, the jury, by a vote of eight to four, awarded the Finstads punitive damages in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Busta Ex Rel. Busta v. Columbus Hospital Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HarrisMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Boreen v. ChristensenMontana Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kiely Construction, L.L.C. v. City of Red Lodge Ex Rel. Red Lodge City CouncilMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Stanley L. and Carolyn M. Watkins Trust v. LacostaMontana Supreme Court · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API