Legal Opinion
New Hampshire Ball Bearing, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided January 3, 2012No. Slip Op. 12-2; Court 08-00398PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Judge:
Plaintiff New Hampshire Ball Bearing, Inc. (“NHBB”) challenges the constitutionality of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 1 (“CDSOA” or “Byrd Amendment”) and the administration of the statute by Defendants. Plaintiff claims that it unlawfully was denied “affected domestic producer” (“ADP”) status, which would have qualified it to receive distributions under the CDSOA. The case is now before the court on dispositive motions. Defendants United States Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “CBP”) and the United States International Trade Commission…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican PartySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schaeffler Group USA, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Ethan Allen Global, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Pat Huval Restaurant & Oyster Bar, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Pat Huval Restaurant & Oyster Bar, Inc. v. United States International Trade CommissionUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.