In re the Estate of Kotlik
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The facts in the present application for revocation of letters of administration are uncontroverted. At some time prior to 1920 the decedent intermarried with a woman by the name of Hedwig. Three children resulted from this union. The husband and wife separated in that year, and from that date to the present no one has been produced who claims to have seen or heard from her.
In an affidavit made by the maternal grandmother of the infants, who has secured for herself the award of letters of administration on the decedent’s estate, verified September 2, 1933, she stated her belief, as…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Caujolle v. . FerrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- In re the Estate of CallahanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Estate of SmithNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In Re the Estate of CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Estate of GoldmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
- In re the Estate of SmidtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of KotlikNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of GropenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of SciscentiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.