Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Goldman
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided October 9, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The facts in this contested application for letters of administration are not in dispute and present a question of conflict of laws which possesses certain features of novelty respecting the validity of a “ get ” or Jewish rabbinical divorce.
In 1903, in Kiev, Russia, Abraham Klein married one Ruth Mintza, who is one of the present applicants for letters. This marriage was solemnized by a rabbi. Four children were born of this marriage. The parties lived together in Russia until 1913, when Klein left his wife and children and emigrated to this country, taking up his residence in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Hubbard v. . HubbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- In re the Estate of CallahanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In Re the Estate of CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Floyd v. Colonial Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- In re the Estate of ScheckNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Estate of ChinskyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of CherneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of O'NeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.