Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Gropen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 24, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henderson, S.

Max Bollinger, a brother of the decedent, brings this proceeding to revoke letters of administration granted to Samuel Gropen. He alleges that letters were obtained upon the false suggestion that Samuel Gropen was the husband of the deceased, and as such, entitled to administer the estate.

Samuel Orenstein and Sadie Bollinger were married in Austria prior to 1907 which is the year that they immigrated to the United States and lived together in lower Manhattan. Max Bollinger, the brother, came some time thereafter and made his home with them. According to Bollinger, Orenstein left…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clayton v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. In re the Application for Letters of Administration de Bonis Non on the Goods, Chattels & Credits of MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. In re the Estate of TyrrellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921
  4. In re the Estate of KotlikNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  5. In re the Estate of SciscentiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of FingerlinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  2. McCarter v. McCarterNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API