Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Sciscenti

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 12, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henderson, S.

Application is made by a son of the decedent for the revocation of the respondent’s letters of administration on the ground that she is not the widow of the decedent.

The matter has been submitted upon an agreed state of facts. Prior to Í920 the respondent had contracted a marriage with one Vincenzo Piscóla who disappeared in that year. She “ will *500testify that she had not heard from him, seen him or could not locate him from that time to this time.” On November 25, 1932, she petitioned the Supreme Court in Bronx county for an order dissolving her marriage pursuant to sections 6…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clayton v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. In re the Estate of CallahanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  3. In Re the Estate of CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of KatzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  5. In re TompkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GropenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re SciscentiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API