Legal Opinion

Remonstrators Below v. City of Fort Wayne

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1991No. 02A03-8904-CV-127PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Remonstrators appeal from a judgment entered in the Allen Superior Court dismissing their remonstrance against a Fort Wayne annexation ordinance. Remon-strators raise five issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as:

I. Whether the trial court's determination that Fort Wayne had not engaged in annexation harassment was contrary to law.

II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion denying Remonstrators' various petitions for injunctive relief.

We affirm.

This action began in 1968 as a remonstrance against Fort Wayne's attempts to annex certain property referred to as…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donavan v. Ivy Knoll Apartments PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. KING v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bartholomew County Hospital v. RyanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Rogers v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Ordinance to Annex Certain TerritoryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In re the Annexation Proposed By Annexation Ordinance Number X-06-91Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. McNicholas v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API