Legal Opinion

Rogers v. City of Evansville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1982No. 1-781A224PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEAL, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

David N. Rogers and Barry A. Schnaken-burg, et al. (Remonstrators) appeal an adverse judgment in the Vanderburgh Circuit Court denying their remonstrance to an annexation ordinance enacted by the City of Evansville (City). We reverse.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

The original annexation ordinance, G77-38, was enacted by the City Council of Evansville on December 15, 1977, for the purpose of annexing a certain territory contiguous to Evansville. Thereafter, on February 27, 1978, in Cause No. 5739, Remon-strators filed their remonstrance in the Vanderburgh Circuit…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. PM Gas & Wash Co., Inc. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Howard D. Johnson Co. v. Parkside Development Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Mishawaka St. Joseph. L. T. Co. v. Neu, Gdn.Indiana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. KING v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1959

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Szakaly v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sandy Ridge Oil Co. v. Centerre Bank National Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ruder v. Ohio Valley Wholesale, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Stubbs v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. (In Re Stubbs)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2005
  5. Baldin v. Calumet National Bank (In Re Baldin)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API