Legal Opinion

City of Grand Rapids v. Iosco Land Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1935No. Docket No. 74, Calendar No. 38,589PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtttzel, J.

In 1925, the city of Grand Rapids by appropriate action widened Division avenue, a State trunk line highway. It paid abutting property owners for the land taken and levied an assessment on the real estate benefited by the improvement for part of its cost. This embraced a parcel of property then owned by the trustees of the estate of Charles F. Young, deceased. The assessment was payable in 10 equal parts, but all could be paid at once, at the option of the taxpayer. The trustees paid $16,045.30, the entire amount of their assessment, on May 16, 1928. In 1931, in accordance with an option…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Savage-Scofield Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Bernays v. WurmbMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Borton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Robertson v. SingletonMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. City CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Asmer v. LIVINGSTONSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Sidenfaden v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  4. Foss v. Halloran & Narr, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. MHI Partnership, Ltd. v. City of League CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API