Legal Opinion

Foss v. Halloran & Narr, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiles F. McDonald, J.

Plaintiff institutes this action both as an individual and as trustee under the last will and testament of his deceased father, Frederic D. Foss, who at the time of his death on June 17, 1954, was the holder of 121 shares of the second preferred stock and 245 shares of the common stock of Foss, Halloran, Narr, Inc., the remaining 76% of both common and preferred being held by Harry R Halloran and Frederick W. Narr.

Mr. Foss in his lifetime was president of the defendant corporation and actively engaged in the corporate business as general manager thereof. The corporation was engaged in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. William C. Atwater & Co. v. Panama RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Kenyon v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. In Re the Probate of the Will of SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Wirth & Hamid Fair Booking, Inc. v. WirthNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Morris v. . SicklyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern County Mutual Insurance v. Surety Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Southern County Mutual Insurance v. Surety Bank, N.A. Individually and D/B/A Surety Premium Finance, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  3. Southern County Mutual Insurance v. Surety Bank, N.A. Individually and D/B/A Surety Premium Finance, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  4. Southern County Mutual Insurance v. Surety Bank, N.A. Individually and D/B/A Surety Premium Finance, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API