Legal Opinion

Bernays v. Wurmb

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Lardbee v. Ovit, 4 Yt. 47 ; Marsh y. Keating, 1 Bing. 198 ; Loclcwood y. Kelsea, 41 N. H. 185 ; Hudson v. Robinson, 4 Mau. & Sel. 478

1Opinion of the Court

Bakewell, J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

It appears from tbe pleadings and tbe agreed statement of facts in this case, that in June, 1866, respondent paid to tbe city of St. Louis $325.20, being tbe amount of a special tax assessed against a lot of respondent, on Salisbury Street, in St. Louis, for laying water-pipe along tbe street. This bill was assessed under an act of March 23, 1863, for extending the water-works. In January, 1867, respondent sold the lot in question to appellant, for $5,725, and conveyed to him by deed of general warranty. At the time of the sale, respondent…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Grand Rapids v. Iosco Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Borton v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Neer v. SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State Ex Rel. Dunmore Realty Co. v. KimballSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  5. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Albia State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API