Savage-Scofield Co. v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order and judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Shackleford, J., entered June 19, 1909, and June 21, 1909, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to recover a rebate on an assessment paid for a local improvement.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
The amended complaint on which appellant has elected to stand in this case, after alleging its corporate existence, the official capacity of the defendants, etc., sets forth that the city of Tacoma, by ordinance and amendments thereto, granted to E. J. Felt certain franchises over the streets of Tacoma, for street railway purposes; that the city *458of Tacoma had passed a certain ordinance, the material part of which was as follows:
“That hereafter when any street covered by this franchise shall have been paved before the laying of tracks under this franchise, before commencing any work on such…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Setser v. Novack Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- LaCoursiere v. CamWest Development, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Grand Rapids v. Iosco Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Polstorff v. FletcherDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.