Legal Opinion

Young v. Young

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1931No. Docket No. 147, Calendar No. 35,819PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzbl, C. J.

Charles F. Young, of Grand Rapids, Michigan, died testate on March 6, 1916, and on the probating of his will, Leland N. Young of Grand Rapids, Michigan, and Cornelius Gerbér of Fremont, Michigan, were appointed trustees of the estate. The will provided that the Michigan Trust Company of Grand Rapids should fill any vacancy in the trusteeship. The largest individual asset of the estate consisted of the Livingston Hotel property at the southeast corner of South Division avenue and Fulton street in the business district of Grand Rapids. Under the express provisions of the will, the trustees were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. In re the Estate of PulitzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  3. Colonial Trust Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  4. Marsh v. ReedIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Johns v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Detroit Trust Co. v. Stormfeltz-Loveley Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Bell v. BellArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Mabry v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API