Legal Opinion
Millar v. Ojima
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 28, 2005No. CV 03-5511(ADS)(ARL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
Michelle Millar and Stephen Koch (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), a married couple, bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. The Plaintiffs also assert a cause of action for “tortuous [stet] interference with their careers” under New York State law. Specifically, the Plaintiffs allege that Iwao Ojima (“Ojima” or the “Defendant”) treated them differently as compared with other married couples who were similarly situated as professors at the State…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Popat v. LevyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Rivera v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Witt v. Village of MamaroneckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- South Lyme Property Owners Ass'n v. Town of Old LymeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Bodkin v. GarfinkleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.