Legal Opinion
Sejnoha v. City of Bisbee
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 25, 1993No. CIV 92-482 TUC RMBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BILBY, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Sejnoha sought damages from the City of Bisbee, the Bisbee Police Department and J.E. Holly, a Bisbee police officer, for alleged violations of his fourth, fifth, and fourteenth amendment rights, which occurred incident to a photo lineup that purportedly was “unduly suggestive and impermissibly tainted.”
Sejnoha also alleged that Holly was grossly negligent, deviated from the standard of care exercised by a reasonable police officer, and committed the torts of false arrest and wrongful imprisonment.
Before the court is the defendants’…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hutsell v. SayreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Hutsell v. SayreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Grant v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Grant v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Alexander v. City of South BendDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.