Legal Opinion
Hutsell v. Sayre
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 29, 1993No. 92-6216PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
In this § 1983 action, plaintiff Stanley R. Hutsell alleges that defendants University of Kentucky police officers Ray Sáyre and W. A. Hayes, as well as the Board of Trustees of the University of Kentucky (“UK”), violated his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights by seeking an arrest warrant without probable cause for an assault of a female student on the UK campus. The district court ruled that plaintiffs claims against UK and the officers in their official ■ capacities were barred by the Eleventh Amendment, *998and that the officers were entitled to qualified…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gregory v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- David M. Mumford v. David A. BasinskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Torre S. Crockett Dushon L. Greene v. Cumberland College Michael B. Colegrove K. David Kersey, City of Williamsburg, Kentucky Don HamlinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Withers v. University of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.