Legal Opinion
New Wrinkle, Inc. v. Fritz
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 6, 1939No. Civ. 188PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
This is a suit for patent infringement and unfair competition practices. The plaintiff is .a Delaware corporation. The defendant Pontiac Varnish Company is a Michigan corporation, and the defendant John Fritz is a resident of the Western District of New York.
1 This motion is made to set aside and quash the summons for lack of jurisdiction. As to the corporate defendant, the alleged lack of jurisdiction is that the corporate defendant is not a resident of the State of New York and does not have any regular and established place of business within that State. As to the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- West Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Mastantuono v. Jacobsen Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- Seven Networks, LLC v. Google LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2018
- Jones v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Kamkap, Inc. v. Worldsbest Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.