Legal Opinion
Movants to Quash Multicounty Grand Jury Subpoena v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 15, 2008No. 104,072PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.
T1 On April 21, 2005, the Supreme Court granted the Attorney General's application to form a multicounty grand jury. Petitioners subsequently received subpoenas from the multicounty grand jury and asked the supervising judge to quash the subpoenas. They argued that the subpoenas were part of an investigation into alleged criminal activity occurring in only one county, a fact admitted by the Attorney General. The judge denied *548Petitioners' request and they filed a petition for a writ of prohibition with the Court of Criminal Appeals. They also requested a stay of the multicounty grand jury…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Draper v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Tate v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Carder v. Court of Criminal AppealsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Chandler (U.S.A.), Inc. v. TyreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Espina v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- White v. HENG LY LIMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.