Legal Opinion

Carder v. Court of Criminal Appeals

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 1978No. 51477PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMMS, Justice:

It speaks well of our bifurcated civil-criminal appellate system that there has not been a jurisdictional conflict between this Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals for more than fifty years. 1 This scarcity of conflict is a testament to both the clarity of jurisdictional boundaries between the two Courts and the constant willingness of the members of each Court to observe and comply with their jurisdictional restrictions.

Petitioners assert that this action squarely presents us with such a jurisdictional conflict. They contend that over their objections, the Court of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Rel Eubanks v. Cole, District JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Dancy v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Ex Parte McCollumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. In Re Benedictine Fathers of Sacred Heart MissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. DavenportSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  3. Prock v. District Court of Pittsburg CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. Movants to Quash Multicounty Grand Jury Subpoena v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. Henry v. MahlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API