Legal Opinion
Tate v. Logan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 2, 1961No. 39639PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
362 P.2d 670 (1961)
Tom TATE, Plaintiff,
v.
Burton LOGAN, State Budget Director of The State of Oklahoma, Defendant.
No. 39639.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
June 2, 1961.
Tom Tate, pro se.
Joseph E. Mountford, Miami, Okl., for plaintiff.
Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Fred Hansen, First Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant.
WILLIAMS, Chief Justice.
Tom Tate, a member of the House of Representatives of the Twenty-eighth Legislature of the State of Oklahoma, plaintiff, in this original proceeding prays for a writ of mandamus to order and command Burton Logan, State Budget Director, defendant, to recognize, audit…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Keating v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Draper v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- State Ex Rel. York v. TurpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. DunbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.