Buohl v. Lockport Brewing Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Patterson,
This is an action in trespass by Chauncey R. Buohl, appellee, and Matilda Buohl, his wife, against Loclqport Brewing Company, appellant, to recover damages resulting when appellee, temporarily blinded by the headlights of an oncoming vehicle, drove into the rear of appellant’s unlighted tractor-trailer which was standing on the highway. A jury returned a verdict in favor of Chauncey Buohl, appellee, in the amount of $5,660 and in favor of Matilda Buohl in the sum of $2,548.35. This appeal is from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment non obstante…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashworth v. HannumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Farley v. VentrescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Nelson v. Damus Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Harkins v. Somerset Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Boor v. SchreiberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cummins v. Southern Fruit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Joseph P. Makowsky, Administrator of the Estate of Albert Makowsky, Deceased v. Michael Povlick and Robert F. StegmeierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Stafford v. Roadway Transit Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
- Notarianni v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Toenges v. SchleihaufSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.