Legal Opinion

Notarianni v. Ross

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1956No. Appeal, 308PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Mr. Justice Allen M. Steaene,

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto in a trespass action concerning collision of two motor vehicles. The pivotal question is whether, in the facts of this case, plaintiff’s failure to stop his automobile within the assured clear distance *64ahead constituted contributory negligence as matter of law. The learned court below ruled that it did.

Anthony Notarianni, the plaintiff, was driving his car northward on Fifth Street, in the City of Philadelphia. He entered a tunnel or underpass on that street, which permits traffic to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simrell Et Ux. v. EschenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Janeway v. Lafferty Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Rich v. Petersen Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Shoffner v. SchmerinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Buohl v. Lockport Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Spearing v. StarcherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Metro v. Long Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Joseph P. Makowsky, Administrator of the Estate of Albert Makowsky, Deceased v. Michael Povlick and Robert F. StegmeierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. Erck v. ZeliosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Block v. BiddleDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API