Legal Opinion

Harkins v. Somerset Bus Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1932No. Appeal, 75PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This case grows out of a rear-end collision at night between a stalled motor bus on its proper side of an 18-foot highway leading from Johnstown to Somerset and a motor vehicle traveling about 35 to 45 miles an hour. Plain tiff’s son, aged 22 years, was a guest in this latter vehicle and in the collision he received fatal injuries. The negligence pleaded was: (1) The stopping of the bus on the highway in the lane of traffic, (2) Permitting it to remain there on a curve without warning to vehicles approaching from the rear, (3) Failure to have proper signal lights…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Galliano v. East Penn Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. CoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  3. Gaber Et Ux. v. WeinbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Cummins v. Southern Fruit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Singer, Admrx. v. MessinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API