Legal Opinion

Toenges v. Schleihauf

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1951No. Appeals, 52 and 53PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

As the court below correctly decided, the contributory negligence of the decedent bars the right of the executor of her estate to recover damages in this action because of her death.

*249As far as defendant’s negligence is concerned the testimony clearly revealed it and it was factually established by the verdict of the jury. At about four o’clock in the afternoon of a March day a truck, a tractor-trailer, employed in defendant’s business, heavily loaded with lumber, was being operated over a public highway in Allegheny County known as Curry Hollow Eoad. The day…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Piquet Et Ux. v. WazelleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Farley v. VentrescoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Rich v. Petersen Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Markle v. PerotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Duffy v. CortesiIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Phillips v. StockmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Duffy v. HardenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Lutz v. ForceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Nagata v. Kahului Development Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API