Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 17, 1999No. CR96-51159; CA A97089PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollhejm, J.

In this criminal case, the state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing evidence obtained in a search of defendant’s bag. The state argues that the trial court erred in suppressing the evidence. We do not reach the merits of the state’s argument because we conclude that the appeal is moot.

Defendant was charged with unlawful possession of a firearm and possession of less than an ounce of marijuana. Before trial, he moved to suppress evidence that had been obtained when a paramedic employed by the City of Salem opened a bag in defendant’s possession in the course of transporting him in an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HoareCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Stahl v. KrasowskiOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Werline v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Grant County Federal Credit Union v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. SulserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. DinsmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. ForrestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. DennyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API