State v. Denny
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. The state appeals a pretrial order suppressing all evidence obtained by a state police officer after he asked defendant to step out of his car. The trial court concluded that the officer’s request that defendant step out of his car violated ORS 810.410(3)(b), as construed in State v. Dominguez-Martinez, 321 Or 206, 895 P2d 306 (1995), and granted defendant’s motion to suppress. The state argues, inter alia, that even if Dominguez-Martinez would otherwise compel suppression, ORS 136.432 (section 1 of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. FugateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. DuffyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. ManivongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999