Legal Opinion

State v. Forrest

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 9, 2001No. C 99-06-45174; A108125PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

The state appeals from an order suppressing the results of field sobriety tests (FSTs) in a prosecution for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, and from an ensuing order of dismissal. ORS 138.060. We conclude that there was objective probable cause to support defendant’s arrest for DUII that preceded the administration of the FSTs. State v. Nagel, 320 Or 24, 880 P2d 451 (1994). We further conclude that all of the FSTs administered here were “nontestimonial” for purposes of State v. Fish, 321 Or 48, 893 P2d 1023 (1995). Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

On review…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HullingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. SinkeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Garcia v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  5. State v. HullingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API