Legal Opinion

Hales v. City of Wauwatosa

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1957PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingeRT, J.

The judgment of the circuit court must be reversed, and that of the civil court reinstated.

The action is founded on sec. 81.15, Stats., the material part of which provides:

“If damages happen to any person or his property by reason of the insufficiency or want of repairs of any highway which any town, city, or village is bound to keep in repair, the person sustaining such damages shall have a right to recover the same from such town, city, or village . . .” up to a maximum of $5,000.

While the terms of the statute suggest absolute liability, it is established by decisions of this court that an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crites v. City of New RichmondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McCormick v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Trobaugh v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Pias v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Racine v. S. C. Johnson & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heims v. HankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Laffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Stippich v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Becker v. City of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Heritage Mutual Insurance v. Sheboygan CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API