Legal Opinion
Pias v. City of Racine
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1953PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
In ruling on defendant’s motion for a directed verdict the trial court concluded, on the basis of McCormick v. Racine (1938), 227 Wis. 33, 277 N. W. 646, that plaintiff had failed to show an actionable defect in the sidewalk. It said:
“While the general area of the bridge and western approach for pedestrians would naturally excite one’s prejudice against the city of Racine for permitting such an over-all condition to exist, the court is of the opinion that the depression and change in elevation at the point where plaintiff fell comes within the rule laid down in McCormick v. Racine, supra, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- McCormick v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by9 opinions
- Laffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- McChain v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Stippich v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Becker v. City of La CrosseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Westler v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.