Legal Opinion

Laffey v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1958PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.

In our opinion the demurrer to the complaint was properly overruled.

1. Cause of action under sec. 81.15, Stats. The complaint sufficiently states a case under sec. 81.15, Stats. That statute provides that “if damages happen to any person ... by reason of the insufficiency or want of repairs of any highway which any . . . city ... is bound to keep in repair, the person sustaining such damages shall have a right to recover the same from such . . . city . . . ,” upon giving a prescribed notice to the city within thirty days after the accident; but “no action shall be maintained to recover…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Village of West SalemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Robb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Virovatz v. City of CudahyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Flamingo v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Trobaugh v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Sambs v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Kobelinski v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Harte v. City of Eagle RiverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Chevron Chemical Co. v. Deloitte & ToucheWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API