Legal Opinion

Becker v. City of La Crosse

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1960PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

In order for the city to have been entitled to summary judgment, the evidentiary facts set out in its affidavits must have established a defense sufficient to defeat the plaintiff. Even then, summary judgment was not to be granted if plaintiff showed facts which the court deemed sufficient to entitle plaintiff to a trial. Sec. 270.635(2), Stats.

1. Whether deject was nonactionable as a matter of law. The city argues that its affidavits establish that as a matter of law, the depression in the crosswalk did not constitute an insufficiency or want of repair under sec. 81.15, Stats.

A civil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McChain v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Johnson v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. McCormick v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Pias v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hales v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hardscrabble Ski Area, Inc. v. First National Bank of Rice LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Dottai v. AltenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bank of Commerce v. PAINE, WEBBER, J. & C.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Goelz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Schandelmeier v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API