Legal Opinion

Pierson v. Holly Sugar Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1951No. Civ. 4181PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

Defendant Holly Sugar Corporation appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in an action brought to recover damages for injuries which he sustained when a freight elevator on which he was riding dropped from the third to the ground floor in defendant’s Santa Ana sugar plant building. There is no dispute as to the nature and extent of plaintiff’s injuries.

Appellant asserts as grounds for reversal of the judgment that the trial court erred in permitting the introduction of certain testimony and in the giving of instructions.

The circumstances under which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robinson v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Biondini v. Amship Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. McKeon v. LissnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Gastine v. EwingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Buckingham v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Armenta v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Porter v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Bayne v. Todd Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Nungaray v. Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Slovick v. James I. Barnes Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API