Legal Opinion

Buckingham v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1932No. Docket No. 4622PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This action was brought by plaintiff against defendant for damages for injuries sustained by him through the alleged negligence of defendant.

The action was tried by a jury which rendered its verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial, and the motion therefor being denied, judgment was rendered for plaintiff and from this judgment defendant has appealed.

■ Appellant owned and operated a cottonseed-oil mill. The cottonseed was hauled to appellant’s yard in automobile trucks, and after the same was weighed by an employee of appellant, the truck containing the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shanley v. American Olive Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Goldstein v. HealyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Powers v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bergen v. Tulare County Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Dobbie v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Edwards v. Hollywood CanteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Biondini v. Amship Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Bickham v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Koppelman v. Ambassador Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API