Legal Opinion

McKeon v. Lissner

California Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1924No. S. F. No. 10156PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Defendants appeal herein from a judgment on verdict in favor of the plaintiff in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff in. falling to the bottom of an elevator shaft in an apartment house operated by the defendants. We adopt the following portion of the opinion of the district court of appeal herein, which was prepared by Mr. Justice St. Sure:

“Plaintiff, looking for an apartment, visited a certain apartment house of which defendants were lessees. Being admitted to the building, she approached an automatic elevator maintained in the premises for the use…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marovich v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Cary v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Sharpless v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Muller v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Jacobi v. Builders' Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. DeGraf v. Anglo California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Atkinson v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Davilla v. Liberty Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API