Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Grooms

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 6, 1917No. 7155PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from County Court, Kiowa County; J. S. Carpenter, Judge. Action by Delia Grooms against J. L. Kinney and Mrs. R. Kinney. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

Delia Grooms brought this action against J. D. Kinney and R. Kinney, to recover a balance alleged to be due for services rendered in the performance of house work and other labor in and about the hotel of defendants. The parties will be designated in accordance with their respective titles in the trial court. After issue joined the case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor against both defendants for $189.26, and defendants prosecute error.

The only grounds urged for reversal of the case are that the verdict and judgment against defendant J. L. Kinney is contrary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Abbott v. DingusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. StegallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Booker Tobacco Co. v. WallerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Kentucky Refining Co. v. Purcell Cotton Seed Oil MillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Nichols-Chandler Home Building & Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Stewart v. BowserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Keller v. TracySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Redfearn v. American Central Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Sooner Distributing Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API