Legal Opinion

Redfearn v. American Central Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 12, 1926No. 15851PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAX, C.

This sui-t is to recover on fire insurance policies on a theater building and a hotel building1 located in the negro section of the city of Tulsa, conceded to have been in force at the time the buildings were totally destroyed by fire. The defense was that -the loss was caused direcly or indirectly by a riot. Each of the policies contained this clause:

“This company shall- not be liable for loss caused directly or indirectly by invasion, insurrection, riot, civil war or commotion, or military or usurped power, or by order of any civil authority. * * *”

The court directed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pac. Heating & Ventilating Co. v. Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co. of BrooklynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Pacific Union Club v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. American Central Insurance v. Stearns Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Kinney v. GroomsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alexander v. OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Rhode Island Ins. Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API