Legal Opinion

Kentucky Refining Co. v. Purcell Cotton Seed Oil Mills

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the District Court of Cleveland County; before ■ C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe court by

HaiNER, J.:

This is an action brought by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff in the court below, to recover damages for the alleged breach of a contract for the sale of oil, which the plaintiff in error purchased from the defendant in error.

The plaintiff alleges in its petition that on the 4th day of August, 1899, it purchased from the defendant twelve thousand, five hundred gallons of crude cotton seed oil, to be delivered during the month • of September, 1899, in tank ears at Purcell, Indian Territory, to be paid for on delivery of the oil, which contract of purchase and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. StegallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Kinney v. GroomsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Schuman Bros. v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Jackson v. NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API