State v. Childers
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
Defendant first assigns as error the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury that defendant could not be found guilty of manufacturing marijuana if it were found that she was growing the plants for her personal use. She contends that in order for her to be found guilty of the offense of manufacturing marijuana, it must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt by the State that she was manufacturing it with intent to distribute, citing State v. Baxter, 21 N.C. App. 81, 203 S.E. 2d 93 (1974) and State v. Whitted, 21 N.C. App. 649, 205 S.E. 2d 611, cert. denied 285…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. ElamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. WhittedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- State v. MarshallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.