State v. Marshall
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, J.
{1} Defendant was found guilty of trafficking methamphetamine by manufacturing, possession of drug paraphernalia, and conspiracy to commit trafficking methamphetamine by manufacturing. The sole issue on appeal is whether Defendant was entitled to a jury instruction on a personal use defense to the trafficking by manufacturing charge. Because we conclude that trafficking by manufacture as defined by the Legislature does not allow for a personal use exception, we affirm the district court’s refusal to instruct the jury on this defense.
BACKGROUND
{2} The facts are generally…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. McCraryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. DuhonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.