Legal Opinion
State v. Whitted
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 5, 1974No. 7414SC348PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
The record contains six groups of assignments of error based on 39 exceptions. Defendant brings forward and argues only two. Although he does not refer to any exception or assignment of error in his brief, since there are only two questions raised, we choose not to invoke the provisions of Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina, and dismiss the appeal. Rather, we shall discuss the two questions on their merits.
Defendant first urges that the evidence in this case should have been suppressed on defendant’s motion because • of the legal insufficiency…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Locke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MarshallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. ChildersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- People v. PearsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. WigginsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977