State of Minnesota v. Douglas John Olson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSS, Judge.
The state charged Douglas Olson with driving while impaired. The prosecutor was unprepared to try the case on the date scheduled for trial because the state’s only witness — the arresting trooper — was voluntarily absent. The prosecutor moved to continue the trial to a later date, warning that if the district court denied the motion, the state would “take action, as it deems fit,” to simply dismiss the charge under criminal procedural rule 30.01 and refile it as a new case. The district court denied the state’s continuance motion and the state dismissed and refiled the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Newman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- United States v. John HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. PetteeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Douglas John OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Rafael Alfonso BanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. David Israel BuenanoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017