State of Minnesota v. Rafael Alfonso Banks
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHUTICH, Judge.
Appellant Rafael Alfonso Banks appeals his conviction for violation of a domestic- abuse no-contact order. See Minn.Stat. § 629.75, subd. -2(c) (2012). He argues that (1) the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the complaint; (2) the district court improperly permitted the state to elicit hearsay evidence, or alternatively, that his trial • counsel’s- failure to object to its admission denied him effective assistance of counsel; (3) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction as a matter of law; and (4) the prosecutor committed prejudicial…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- John Mark Hentges v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Lionel Curtis DrewCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017