Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Rafael Alfonso Banks

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 2016No. A15-279PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHUTICH, Judge.

Appellant Rafael Alfonso Banks appeals his conviction for violation of a domestic- abuse no-contact order. See Minn.Stat. § 629.75, subd. -2(c) (2012). He argues that (1) the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the complaint; (2) the district court improperly permitted the state to elicit hearsay evidence, or alternatively, that his trial • counsel’s- failure to object to its admission denied him effective assistance of counsel; (3) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction as a matter of law; and (4) the prosecutor committed prejudicial…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Mark Hentges v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. State of Minnesota v. Lionel Curtis DrewCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API