Legal Opinion

People v. Mastrodonato

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alexander, J.

A law enforcement officer’s disclosure in a search warrant application of intercepted communications relating to unanticipated criminal activity by persons who are not the targets of the eavesdropping warrant is a use of those communications "appropriate to the proper performance of [the officer’s] official duties” (CPL 700.65 [2]) and not a use "while giving testimony under oath in any criminal proceeding in any court” (CPL 700.65 [3]). Accordingly, no retrospective amendment of the eavesdropping warrant is required by the statute (see, CPL 700.65 [4]).

I

Defend…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. Di StefanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. BasilicatoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. WinogradNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. LicavoliDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
  5. People v. MastrodonatoNew York Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CapolongoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Dampman v. MorgenthauNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. DeMieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. ScheryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API