Legal Opinion
People v. Winograd
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 20, 1986PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alexander, J.
On this appeal, we are called upon to determine whether the People have complied with the mandates of CPL article 700 in their conduct of a wiretap investigation. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the People have failed to satisfy various statutory requirements and accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division affirming defendant’s conviction must be reversed and a new trial ordered.
I
Defendant and her husband, who operated a furrier business in Manhattan, were suspected of conducting a fencing operation from their place of business. A police…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. CosmeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. Di StefanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. BasilicatoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WashingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. ScoccoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Williams v. Varig Brazilian AirlinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. MullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. FonvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.