Legal Opinion

People v. Di Stefano

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1976PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.

We consider for the first time1 the effect of the Criminal Procedure Law provision (CPL 700.65, subd 4) requiring retroactive judicial amendment of an eavesdropping warrant prior to the admission at trial of an intercepted "communication which was not otherwise sought”, in the original warrant. Present also are questions whether evidence other than statistical data suffices to establish that an eavesdropping warrant was executed in such a manner so as to minimize the interception of communications not otherwise sought to be intercepted and, additionally, whether the revised Penal Law (L 1965,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. MahboubianNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Gonzalez v. City of SchenectadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  4. People v. AcostaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API