Legal Opinion
Dampman v. Morgenthau
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*104OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold J. Rothwax, J.
This is an action for declaratory relief1 pursuant to CPLR 3001 to determine the propriety of disclosure, in an arbitration proceeding, of conversations seized by law enforcement officers pursuant to an eavesdropping warrant issued by a Justice of this court. The petitioner was intercepted pursuant to the warrant, and the conversations seized were introduced against him in a proceeding to terminate his employment. The respondents, the District Attorney of New York County whose office disclosed the material, and the New York Times Company,2 to whom the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dondi v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Natoli v. SullivanNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- In re NYP Holdings, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2003
- Ruskin v. SafirNew York Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahoney v. StaffaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998