Legal Opinion
People v. Capolongo
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 1995PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
The central question we confront is whether New York law —in particular CPL article 700 — governs admissibility in New York prosecutions of foreign wiretap evidence. This question, not expressly answered by our comprehensive statutory scheme for electronic eavesdropping or previously addressed by us, foreshadows issues that will undoubtedly recur as boundaries dissolve in an era of electronic and satellite communication.
We turn first to consideration of the events here, which included independent investigations in New York and Canada and culminated in…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Byars v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Abdur-Rashid v. N.Y.C. Police Dep'tCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- People v. FonvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. KramerNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. DarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. ClarkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.