Legal Opinion

Heiman v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 2007No. B187206PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, Acting P. J.

Petitioner, a professional property manager, hired an unlicensed and uninsured contractor to install rain gutters on a condominium building, and an employee of the contractor was seriously injured on the first day of the job. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) concluded that petitioner was the employer liable for workers’ compensation. Petitioner contends that the WCAB erred because petitioner was instructed to hire the unlicensed contractor as the agent of the condominium homeowners association or the condominium owners, which were found not liable for…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. S. G. Borello & Sons, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
  5. DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Aguilera v. HeimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Loranger v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Zaragoza v. IbarraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Vebr v. CulpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API